Legal Opinion

State v. Keith

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 10, 2005No. 2 CA-CR 2005-0026PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Peter Keith was convicted of aggravated assault of a police officer and sentenced to an enhanced, presumptive 3.75-year prison term. On appeal, he contends he was entitled to a jury trial on his prior convictions and that his double jeopardy rights were violated because the court found he had prior convictions after the jury was dismissed. Because he does not have the right to have a jury determine prior convictions and double jeopardy principles do not apply to the prior conviction determination, we affirm.

PRIOR CONVICTIONS

II2…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. UrquidezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. State v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API