State v. Keith
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Peter Keith was convicted of aggravated assault of a police officer and sentenced to an enhanced, presumptive 3.75-year prison term. On appeal, he contends he was entitled to a jury trial on his prior convictions and that his double jeopardy rights were violated because the court found he had prior convictions after the jury was dismissed. Because he does not have the right to have a jury determine prior convictions and double jeopardy principles do not apply to the prior conviction determination, we affirm.
PRIOR CONVICTIONS
II2…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. UrquidezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.