Legal Opinion

State v. Yost

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 3, 1982No. 54,290PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Frederick Woleslagel,

District Judge Retired: The subject matter of this case is restitution in orders of ^ .iminal case proba tion. It centers on the power of a court to provide restitution payments to a party secondarily aggrieved when he has compensated the original aggrieved party.

Defendant brings a direct appeal from an order which modified the restitution provision of an earlier order of probation. The original provision for probation provided for restitution to the direct, and original, victim of defendant’s crime. When the revised order was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Karrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. EiltsWashington Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. DeadmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. State v. DubishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. KeeleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. State v. HinckleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API