Legal Opinion
Harmon v. Meese
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 29, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-1766PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and defendants’ motion to dismiss and for summary judgment.
Plaintiffs are forty-two employees of the Department of Justice who seek to enjoin implementation of the Department’s “Drug Free Workplace Plan” in the Offices, Boards and Litigating Divisions of the Department. Under the plan, plaintiffs would be selected at random and ordered to produce urine specimens in order to permit the Department to ascertain whether they illegally use drugs. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mark B. Harmon v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- American Federation of Government Employees v. CavazosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Bangert v. HodelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Hartness v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.