Legal Opinion

T & T Loveland Chinchilla Ranch, Inc. v. Bourn

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 3, 1972No. 25399PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

The respondent-claimants were awarded benefits by the Industrial Commission by reason of the death of their husband and father as a result of a heart attack. This matter was first here in T & T Loveland Chinchilla Ranch v. Bourn, 173 Colo. 267, 477 P.2d 457 (1970), after the Industrial Commission held that compensation could not be awarded as overexertion had not been shown. In that 1970 opinion we held that, by reason of an amendment of the statute, it was not necessary to show overexertion, and that the legislative intent in the amendment was to make compensable an injury or death which had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cinderella Career and Finishing Schools, Inc., Stephen Corporation, Vincent Melzac v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Industrial Commission v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Womack v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  4. T & T Loveland Chinchilla Ranch v. BournSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Prestige Homes, Inc. v. LegouffeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. CITY & CTY. OF DENVER v. Indus. CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Public Service Co. of Colo. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. Walton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Harrison Western Corp. v. of Death of HicksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API