Legal Opinion

Neudeck v. Bransten

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1965No. Civ. 22209PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Plaintiff, Mary Neudeck, filed this action for personal injuries and the wrongful death of her sister resulting from a collision with an automobile owned by defendant, William H. Bransten, and driven by his minor son, defendant, James V. Bransten, hereafter referred to as James. On this appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, the contentions are that the trial court erred in rejecting certain expert evidence and in refusing to instruct the jury on the special standard of care applicable to a minor driver.

As no contentions are raised concerning the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Strandt v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Pearson v. State Social Welfare BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Lehmuth v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prichard v. Veterans Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Daniels v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  3. Schauf v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Fox v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API