Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Evans

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 31, 1966No. 5501PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

As to the standard of care to be applied to the conduct of the decedent Robert E. Daniels, 19 years of age, the Trial Court charged the jury in part as follows:

“ Now, he is considered a minor, being under the age of twenty-one, and a minor child must exercise the care of the average child of his or her age, experience and stage of mental develop - ment. In other words, he is not held to the same degree of care as an adult. ”

Concededly these instructions substantially reflect the rule by which the care of a minor has been judged heretofore in the courts of our state. Charbonneau v. MacRury, 84…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Wagner v. ShanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  3. Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Harrelson v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Prichard v. Veterans Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robinson v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dorais v. PaquinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. State v. DeflorioSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. Morse v. GodutiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. Robinson v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API