Legal Opinion
Concerned Citizens of Hospital District No. 304 v. Board of Commissioners of Public Hospital District No. 304
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 30, 1995No. 35229-6-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Concerned Citizens of Hospital District 304 appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the boards that govern and operate two public hospitals. Concerned Citizens argues that the trial court improperly awarded summary judgment because the hospital boards (1) unlawfully spent bond proceeds, (2) breached a contract with Concerned Citizens, (3) are equitably estopped from terminating services, (4) violated the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA), (5) acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, and (6) violated Concerned Citizens’ civil rights. We affirm.
*337This case…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Salary of the Juvenile DirectorWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. POLLUTION CONTROLWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Center v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Concerned Citizens of Hospital District No. 304 v. Board of Commissioners of Public Hospital District No. 304Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Critz v. Union Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001