Trautman v. Warfield & Rohr Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.
The question on the facts of this appeal is, Was the owner’s chauffeur acting within the. scope of his employment while driving, at the request of the repairman’s shop foreman, the motor truck of the owner around a city block for the purpose of enabling the foreman to test if certain repairs and adjustments, -which, had been made at the request of the owner, had put the truck in good running condition and ready for delivery to the owner’s chauffeur? While this trial was in progress, an accident happened and the foreman, Paul A. Trautman, was injured. The injuries sustained by Trautman were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hooper v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Jordan Stabler Co. v. TankerslyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Salowitch v. KresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Butt v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kohler v. SheffertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Cloughley v. Orange Transportation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1958
- Carstarphen v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Miller v. ShegogueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960