Legal Opinion

Jordan Stabler Co. v. Tankersly

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 15, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The exceptions in this case consist of two, the first to the admissibility of evidence, and the second to the ruling of the court on the prayers. At the conclusion of the evidence the plaintiff offered ten prayers and the defendant thirteen. The court granted the plaintiff’s fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth prayers .and overruled the defendant’s special exceptions, to the plaintiff’s fifth, seventh and eighth prayers, and rejected the defendant’s first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eleventh and thirteenth .prayers and granted the defendant’s seventh, eighth, ninth and twelfth prayers.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vonderhorst Brewing Co. v. AmrhineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  2. Geiselman v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  3. Baltimore Consolidated Railway Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Dearholt Motor Sales Co. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  5. Stewart Taxi-Service Co. v. GetzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. East Coast Freight Lines, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. International Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. QuickMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Salowitch v. KresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. National Trucking & Storage, Inc. v. DurkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API