Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Riddle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 7, 1919No. 9179PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Iiayson, Judge. Action by J. B. Riddle and another against A. F. Stewart and another for breach of a building contract. From judgment in favor of the plaintiffs the defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.
This is an action for the alleged breach of a building contract. The cause was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of $713.75.
' The first two assignments of error are as follows:
“First. The court erred in admitting over the objections and exceptions of plaintiffs in error, incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial testimony.
“Second. The court erred in holding that defendants in error could recover as damages, what it would cost them to have the building repaired and put in the same condition as the Enoch’s bungalow.”
And under these assignments of error it is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graves v. Allert FuessTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Wiebener v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by11 opinions
- Speaks v. SpeaksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Oilton State Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Jones v. FeatherstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Melton v. HunnicuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.