Legal Opinion
Loe v. Whitman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1956No. 8504PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLADNEY, Judge.
The defendants applied for and were granted an order of suspensive appeal from a judgment rendered by the Second Judicial District Court making absolute a rule nisi enjoining them “and anyone acting under or through or in consort with them or either of them, from taking advantage of their possession of the plaintiff’s * * * mule * * * to sell or dispose of said mule.” The order of appeal was made returnable to this court on January 31, 1955. The appellants filed bond and properly perfected their appeal, but failed to deposit the five dollars fee required by Rule 3 of this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monnier v. GodboldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Danna v. Yazoo M v. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Thibodaux v. Town of ThibodauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
- Strahan v. FussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Tucker v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Loe v. WhitmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Deal v. Lexing-PowellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Murry v. Southern Pulpwood InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Akins v. Jefferson ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Williams v. WeemsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.