Ludewig v. Houston Pipeline Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
This is a condemnation action. After preliminary negotiations failed, appellee Houston Pipeline Co. (HPL), filed its original Statement and Petition in Condemnation in which it sought to acquire a 50-foot wide pipeline easement through appellants’ (Ludewigs’) property. A description of the easement sought and a plat were attached to the original statement and petition. Three special commissioners conducted a hearing and awarded appellants the sum of $25,000.00. Appellants rejected the award as “grossly inadequate,” while appellee la-belled it “grossly excessive;” both…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Miller v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Klein Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Public Utility Commission v. Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- City Nat. Bank of Dallas v. FolsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Austin v. Harry M. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Malcomson Road Utility District v. Newsom, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Anderson v. Teco Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Harris County Hospital District v. Textac Partners I, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Zboyan v. Far Hills Utility District, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.