Legal Opinion

In re Williams

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 14, 1917No. 2577PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the bankruptcy of Norman Williams. On question certified by referee. Question answered, and trustee in bankruptcy held entitled to receive all funds in possession of the receiver in the state court at the time of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

KIKKITS, District Judge.

This case is certified by IT. D. Grindle, referee, for the decision of the court on the following question:

“May the receiver appointed by a state court, and his attorney, be paid fees allowed them for their services by the state court, out of the funds in the possession of said receiver; said allowance having been made after an adjudication in bankruptcy and upon the filing of a report by said receiver in the state court?”

The facts are as follows: On October 27, 1915, a receiver appointed by the common pleas court of Hardin county, Ohio, took possession of the property…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. In re MunfordDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1919
  3. Murray v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Park Lane Dresses, Inc. v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
  5. Scott v. GoodmanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API