Legal Opinion

Bolognese v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1935No. 5369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting title to certain property in Salt Lake City in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants. Separate appeals are taken by defendants Fidelity Investment Company and H. J. Steiner. The other defendants defaulted and have taken no part in the appeal.

Plaintiff brought this action against G. R. Anderson and wife, Mrs. George W. Plummer, the Fidelity Investment Company, and H. J. Steiner, and unknown defendants, to quiet title to a small tract of land in Salt Lake City. The complaint alleges in substance that the plaintiff is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olsen v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Eastman v. GurreyUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Moon v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Asper v. MoonUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Bean v. FairbanksUtah Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hansen v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bolognese v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Anson v. EllisonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bolognese v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mecham v. Mel-O-Tone Enterprises, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API