Legal Opinion

Bolognese v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1939No. 6036PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment upholding the validity of a tax title. The action has been here before. See 87 Utah 450, 44 P. 2d 706; Id., 87 Utah 455, 49 P. 2d 1034. The primary issue on the prior appeal, and now presented, goes to the validity of the tax proceedings.

On the former appeal this court unanimously determined the tax deed to be invalid on the record before it but reversed the action and granted a new trial for other reasons. So far as the tax proceedings are concerned we are convinced that the facts now disclosed by the record remain essentially the same…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burton v. HooverUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Norback v. Board of Directors of Church Extension Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Clark v. Los Angeles Salt Lake R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Fisher v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bolognese v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Babcock v. DangerfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Toronto v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Reeve v. BlatchleyUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Crystal Lime & Cement Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Mercur Coalition Min. Co. v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API