Lieberman v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
On a difficult question of statutory interpretation, seldom does a court of appeals have the benefit, as we do in this case, of guidance from two cogent, well-reasoned opinions going in opposite directions. The difficulty of the question is revealed not only in the direct conflict between these two decisions, but also in the three-to-two decision of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), the administrative agency that deals with the statute we must interpret. The question is whether section 7A(h) of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a(h) (1982), enacted as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown and Brown, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Lieberman v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985