Legal Opinion

Cuevas v. De Roco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2008No. 06-15403PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs Armando Cuevas and Heather Burlette appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment against them on their civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 Although Plaintiffs alleged a variety of constitutional violations in the district court, they press on appeal only their claim that a warrantless entry into their residence on February 25, 2004, was unlawful under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.

Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs, as we must, we conclude that Deputy Sheriff Christopher Starr violated Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Lambert GrandberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Anthony PedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Franz GreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. GatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. United States v. KingDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API