Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clemens

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 2, 2004No. 03-P-686PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant appeals from his conviction of criminal harassment, G. L. c. 265, § 43A. The evidence showed five incidents, all of which took place at one or another of the complainant’s two places of employment, an Aveda cosmetics store in the Natick Mall and Brandéis University in Waltham.

The first incident: the defendant stood at the door of the Aveda store as the complainant was closing the shop for the night. He said, “So this is where you work.” She said the shop was closed, and the defendant walked away. The second: the defendant entered Aveda, struck up a conversation with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. KwiatkowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. JulienMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. BibboMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. PatonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API