Commonwealth v. Bibbo
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtRapoza, J.
The defendant appeals from his conviction of unarmed burglary.1 Specifically, he contends that (1) the trial judge erred when he permitted the jury to consider whether the defendant had intended to commit the felony of stalking for purposes of the burglary charge and (2) the trial judge’s instruction with respect to the intent to commit a stalking impermissibly lessened the Commonwealth’s burden of proof. We affirm.
1. Factual background. We summarize the relevant facts. In October, 1994, the defendant met Melanie Castellucci at a home*649less shelter in Keene, New Hampshire, where she was an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Commonwealth v. GunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. ClaudioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WellardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. LauzierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. ClemensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Sheehan ex rel. Eight Mates Trust v. Plymouth Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003