Legal Opinion
Wheeler v. City of Wayzata
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1995No. C2-93-775PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
On the petition of the defendant City of Wayzata we review a decision of the court of appeals reversing summary judgment in favor of Wayzata. Plaintiffs had sued in the alternative for a declaration of the invalidity of all Wayzata’s zoning ordinances and permanent injunction against their enforcement or for mandamus to compel proceedings in eminent domain. We reverse the decision of the court of appeals and reinstate the summary judgment entered by the district court.
The dispute revolves about the use of a spit of land projecting into Lake Minnetonka and lying between…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- MATTER OF FULLING v. PalumboNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- 113 Hillside Avenue Corp. v. ZainoNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. Modern Box Makers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Briggs v. BuzzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Graham v. Itasca County Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Bonge v. County of MadisonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lakehead Pipe Line Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.