Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 2, 1939No. Civ. No. 246PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This action is brought by plaintiff, an enlisted man in the United States Navy, to recover the sum of $350 for reenlistment allowances under the basic pay act known as the Joint Service Pay Act of June 10, 1922, 37 U.S.C. § 16, 37 U.S.C.A. § 16. The pertinent part of Section 16 reads as follows: “ * * * an enlistment allowance equal to $50 multiplied by the number-*69of years served in the enlistment period from which he has last been discharged, but not to exceed $200, shall be paid to every honorably discharged enlisted man of the first three grades who reenlists…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Steele v. United States No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Burnap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. United States v. LangstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. McGrath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomason v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1948
  2. Surowitz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Walsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Chambers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API