Legal Opinion
Surowitz v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 28, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
This is an action brought under the Tucker Act, by a former employee of the United States suing for unpaid salary and reimbursement of travel expenses. He alleges an employment contract with the defendant and its breach. The following allegation of the complaint is admitted in the answer:
“Fourth: That on or about August 13, 1946, plaintiff entered into a contract of employment with the defendant to serve as a War Department Attorney for the prosecution of War Crimes in the European Theater for a period of one year.”
Both parties have moved for summary, judgment under…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hall v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. MouatSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Burnap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Gordon v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
- Walsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957