Legal Opinion

Brummet v. Farel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 2, 1991No. 5-90-0358PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Howerton

The circuit court ruled that plaintiff made judicial admissions in a pretrial deposition, and on the strength of those admissions, granted summary judgment for defendant. We reverse, holding that the admissions were evidentiary, not judicial, admissions.

Plaintiff was injured while riding as a passenger in a truck driven by his father, defendant. The truck collided with a car driven by Michael Farel.

In support of his motion for summary judgment, defendant attached plaintiffs deposition testimony:

“Q. Do you know whether he [father] applied his brakes or not as he got over to the rail?

A. I…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kolakowski v. VorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Van's Material Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hansen v. Ruby Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Motz v. Central National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. McCormack v. HaanIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. MC Baldwin Financial Co. v. DiMaggio, ROSARIO & VERAJA, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Sohaey v. Van CuraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Caponi v. Larry's 66Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. People v. MindhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. DiMucciAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API