Legal Opinion
City of Cupertino v. City of San Jose
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1960No. Civ. 19123PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
This action arises from intercity competition for the right to annex uninhabited territory.
Cupertino’s city council, by resolution of May 12, 1958, proposed to annex territory designated as Bubb Number 1. Fifteen days later the San Jose City Council adopted a like resolution relating to substantially the same uninhabited territory, which it designated as Stelling Number 1. Cupertino, on July 21, 1958, terminated its proceeding because of its failure to obtain the consent of certain owners of land zoned exclusively for agricultural purposes (“greenbelted”) which consent is a required condition…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Lorenson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People Ex Rel. City of Pasadena v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McAllister v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Fuller v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People Ex Rel. City of Torrance v. City of GardenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961