Legal Opinion

Starzenski v. City of Elkhart

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1996No. 20A05-9502-CV-56PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARTEAU, Judge..

Sophie Starzenski, Kazmer Starzenski and Gennie Starzenski appeal from the trial court's order denying the Starzenskis's request for a preliminary injunction against the City of Elkhart (hereinafter, "the City"), which removed trash and debris from the Starzenskis's property. We heard oral argument on November 27, 1995, at the Valparaiso University School of Law.

ISSUES

We consolidate and restate the issues raised on appeal as:(1) Whether the Starzenskis may attack an order issued under Ind.Code 36-7-9-5 and affirmed under I.C. 36-7-9-7 in a collateral proceeding.(2)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Carmel v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Meyer Waste System, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2000
  3. Sneed v. Associated Group InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Blanchard v. City of RalstonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API