Legal Opinion

Dible v. City of Lafayette

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1997No. 79A02-9610-CV-619PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Leonard F. and Barbara H. Dible [Dible] appeal the adverse summary judgment in their action against the City of Lafayette [City] requesting an injunction prohibiting the City from constructing excessive and unnecessary improvements on their land. Dible raises six issues which we restate and consolidate. The dispositive issue may be restated as follows:

whether genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether the City violated Dible’s due process and property rights by constructing on Dible’s land a large storm sewer drain and a sewage lift station that were…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. ReakirtSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Rambo v. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Board of Zoning Appeals v. LeiszIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Leonard/Barbara Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API