Legal Opinion

City of Carmel v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2008No. 29S04-0611-CV-469PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

The City of Carmel enacted an ordinance regulating mining within the City. The trial court prohibited enforcement of the ordinance based on the argument of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., a mining concern, that the City did not follow the statutory requirements applicable to enacting zoning ordinances. We find that the City was not required to utilize the zoning process in order to regulate mining in this way.

Background

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. has mined, processed, and sold sand, gravel, and limestone within the corporate limits of the City of Carmel for several…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ennis v. State Highway CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. City of North Vernon v. Jennings Northwest Regional UtilitiesIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. BBL, Inc. v. City of AngolaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Reed v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Don H. Gunderson and Bobbie J. Gunderson, Co-Trustees of the Don H. Gunderson Living Trust v. State of Indiana, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Alliance for the Great LakesIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Christopher Tiplick v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Town of Avon v. West Central Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API