Legal Opinion
Gruenebaum v. Lissauer
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1945PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, upon the grounds (a) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (b) that plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue, and (c) that the complaint does not allege any grounds for the appointment of a receiver of the property of defendant Associated Metals & Minerals Corporation (hereinafter called “ Associated ”). Defendants move, in the alternative, (a) for an order, pursuant to rule 103, striking out certain allegations of the complaint upon the ground that they…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Rapid Transit Subway Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Orr v. Kinderhill Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- De West Realty Corp. v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Gafco, Inc. v. H. D. S. Mercantile Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1965
- United States v. Red Stripe, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Brown v. KimmelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.