Pilon v. Bally Engineering Structures
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
This is an appeal from a trial court order, entered August 17, 1993, by which an action was terminated for inactivity pursuant to Berks County Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and Pa.R.J.A. 1901.
The order from which the instant appeal was filed did not enter a judgment of non pros. The order terminated the action for lack of activity pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. 1901. Although the effect of a judgment of non pros and an order terminating the action are virtually identical, each serves a slightly different purpose and entails a different procedure.1
Pa.R.J.A. 1901(a) establishes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pennridge Electric, Inc. v. Souderton Area Joint School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Gates v. Servicemaster Commercial ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Stock v. ArnottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Neshaminy Constructors, Inc. v. Plymouth TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Majczyk v. OeschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Mount Olivet Tabernacle Church v. Edwin L. Wiegand DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Castings Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Shope v. EagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Oxford Presbyterian Church v. Weil-McLain Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.