Hoffman v. Buggs
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
“It is the well-recognized rule that when a jury’s findings are attacked, particularly when they have had the trial court’s approval, our inquiry is limited to the issue whether there is any credible evidence that, under any reasonable view, supports such findings. With the rule in mind we consider that it is necessary to recite only the testimony which supports the jury’s findings. Some of it is in dispute, but as to the disputed testimony we must recognize that it was for the jury to determine where the truth lies.” Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co. (1954), 266 Wis. 106, 109, 62 N. W.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Estate of JavornikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Zernia v. Capitol Court Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Combs v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Olsen v. Milwaukee Waste Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.