Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Broomall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1957No. Appeal, No. 138PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

Philadelphia has an ordinance which imposes “a tax of ten per centum of gross receipts from all transactions in or for the parking of automobiles or motor vehicles on open parking lots in the City of Philadelphia.” This ordinance, imposed under the authority of the Act of August 5, 1932, P. L. 45, 53 PS §4613, is constitutional. Philadelphia v. Samuels, 338 Pa. 321, 12 A. 2d 79 (1940).

During the years 1951 and 1952 Caspar J. Broomall, the defendant in this case, operated an open *298parking lot in the City of Philadelphia. He filed reports as required by the above…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Commonwealth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Barber's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Pittsburgh Milk Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Panther Valley Television Co. v. Summit Hill BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glendale Heights Ownership Ass'n v. Glenolden Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API