Sirrah Enterprises LLC v. Wayne Wunderlich Et Ux
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE TIMMER,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 The law implies a warranty of workmanship and habitability into every residential construction contract. This Court has wrestled with application of this warranty on several occasions. We reenter the fray and here decide whether the successful party on a claim for breach of the warranty qualifies for an attorney-fee award under either a contractual fee provision or AR.S. § 12-341.01. Because the warranty is imputed into the construction contract, it is a term of the contract. Any claim for breach of that term arises from the contract, The successful…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Richards v. Powercraft Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Woodward v. Chirco Const. Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Lacer v. Navajo CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Bestwick v. Newmar CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Dennis Teufel v. American family/kerry HansonArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Dennis Teufel v. American family/kerry HansonArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- GALLERY v. K HOVNANIANArizona Supreme Court · 2026
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.