Legal Opinion
Bompane v. Enzolabs, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lawrence Newmark, J.
Motion by defendant Enzolabs, Inc. for summary judgment in its favor is denied. Summary judgment is awarded to the plaintiff, the court exercising its authority to grant such judgment to a nonmoving party pursuant to CPLR 3212 (b), and entry of judgment is stayed pending further determination of the court, as described in the following decision.
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Labor Law § 740, the so-called "whistleblower” law, claiming that the termination of her employment was in retaliation for her having made a complaint to the Suffolk…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Turner v. . KouwenhovenNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Kern v. DePaul Mental Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Easterson v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Fagan v. AxelrodNew York Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carroll v. Bayerische LandesbankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Villarin v. Rabbi Haskel Lookstein SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Kraus v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Rodgers v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Villarin v. Rabbi Haskel Lookstein SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012