Legal Opinion

Clute v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided September 17, 2008No. GDTC-AA-07-130-PMGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*476MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

GUERNSEY, Chief Judge.

Oral argument was conducted and briefs submitted pursuant to Defendant’s Motion for Rectification as to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Present Additional Evidence. The background of this motion and the administrative agency’s final decision which is the subject of this appeal are set forth in an earlier opinion of this Court1 and will not be repeated.

There is no dispute as to the materiality of the evidence which Plaintiff seeks to submit,2 rather, the sole issue now before the Court is whether the second requirement for the submission of additional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Salmon v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Ager v. Office of Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
  3. Gervasoni v. McGrathConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
  4. Culley v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clute v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API