Commonwealth v. Steckel
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the January 25, 2005 order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Clinton County denying Appellant’s motion to appeal nunc pro tunc from the order denying Appellant’s motion for the appointment of counsel. Appellant contends (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to appeal nunc pro tunc since the court did not inform Appellant he had thirty days to file an appeal, and (2) the trial court erred in denying his request for the appointment of counsel. For the following reasons, we quash this appeal.
¶2 The relevant facts and procedural…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grant v. BlaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- In re N.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Duttry v. TalkishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robinson, T. v. Folino, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015