Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Andersen Coal Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 15, 1906No. 669PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

In this case the appellants formed a co-partnership, located and doing business in the district of Massachusetts, and were adjudged involuntary bankrupts under clause 4 of section 3 of the act of July 1, 1898 (30 Stat. 546, c. 541 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3422]), amended by the act of February 5, 1903 (32 Stat. 797, c. 487, § 2 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 683]), to read as follows:

*294“Or (4) made a general assignment for tlie benefit of his creditors, or, being insolvent, applied for a receiver or trustee for bis property, or because of insolvency a receiver or trustee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Falmouth National Bank v. Cape Cod Ship Canal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Zugalla v. International Mercantile AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  3. Moss Nat. Bank v. ArendCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Wm. S. Butler & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1913
  2. Powell v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1907
  3. Doyle-Kidd Dry Goods Co. v. Sadler-Lusk Trading Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1913
  4. In re Kennedy Tailoring Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1909
  5. In re Boston & Oaxaca Mining Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API