Legal Opinion

Caulkins v. Crabtree

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 1995No. CR 94-153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is an original action seeking a writ of prohibition to preclude a trial John Thompson Caulkins, the petitioner, contends would be in violation of his right to a speedy trial as provided in Ark. R. Crim P. 28.1(c). We grant the writ because the trial did not take place within the prescribed one year period. The one year period began when Mr. Caulkins waived extradition from Texas on November 7, 1992. He should have been tried no later than November 7, 1993. We disagree with the Trial Court’s conclusion that the State demonstrated two periods of time to be excluded…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. State v. PizzutoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Meine v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ibsen v. PleggeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Durdin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Holbert v. Arkansas County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Smith v. PleggeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API