Legal Opinion

Huber v. Boyle

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 9, 1936No. 13,801PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

This is a contest over the will of Samuel Holmes.

Holmes died August 31,1932, leaving a purported will, dated February 21,1930', naming as his sole devisees and legatees his nieces Daisy M. Holmes and her sister, Florence Holmes Soule. Miss Holmes filed petitions for the probate of the will and for the appointment of John M. Boyle as administrator to collect. In both she stated under oath that she and her sister were the only heirs at law of the deceased. At that time she knew that Mrs. Pratt, a great-niece of Holmes, was living in California, and Miss Holmes had been told that Mrs. W. H.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pomeroy v. BentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. In Re the Estate of NewhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kopeikin v. Merchants Mortgage & Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Matter of Estate of ObraWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bennett v. GREELEY GAS COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
  5. BP America Production Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API