In Re Nomination Petition of Berg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 1998, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed. Opinion to follow.
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This opinion is filed in support of the per curiam order of this Court dated May 11, 1998. The order affirmed an order entered by Judge Doyle of the Commonwealth Court which granted a petition to set aside nomination petition.
On or about March 10, 1998, Phil Berg, Appellant, filed a Nomination Petition with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the office of Governor in the Democratic primary. Berg obtained over 3,000 signatures from 36 different…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Council of Alternative Political Parties v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Stein v. CortésDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Idaho Coalition United for Bears v. CenarrussaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- D.C. v. School District of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Marijuana Policy Project v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008
- Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Pedro CortesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.