Legal Opinion

Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Pedro Cortes

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 13, 2017No. 16-3266Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge

Numerous individuals and groups, collectively known as the “Aspiring Parties,” 1 filed suit to enjoin the application of certain of Pennsylvania’s election laws, arguing that those laws were unconstitutional as applied to them. They prevailed. The District Court then entered a permanent injunction, imposing county-based signature-gathering requirements that the Aspiring Parties must meet in order to appear on the ballot. The Aspiring Parties appeal once more, arguing that those requirements are an unconstitutional vote dilution scheme in violation of the Equal…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Carol AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API