Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of D.D.S.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 12, 1986No. C5-86-413PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
D.D.S. was adjudicated delinquent based on a determination that he committed an act of theft from the person, Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 3(3)(a) (1984). 1 The determination that he committed an act of theft from the person was based on evidence that he took a radio that was not actually on the person of another but only in the other’s presence. D.D.S. appealed to the Court of Appeals, claiming that the theft was not from the person of another. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion as a result of a 6-6 split among the twelve judges. We granted review for the sole…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. EnoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ShambergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- United States v. Rodney T. HowzeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- People v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.