Legal Opinion

Canal Insurance v. Lebanon Insurance Agency, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided April 13, 2008No. 1:07CV00050PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES P. JONES, Chief Judge.

In this diversity case, the plaintiff, Canal Insurance Company (“Canal”), seeks indemnity from the defendants, Lebanon Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Lebanon”) and Piedmont Transportation Underwriters, Inc. (“Piedmont”), for the sum of $500,000 that Canal paid in settlement of an uninsured/underinsured motorist claim.

Lebanon and Piedmont have both filed Motions to Dismiss Canal’s First Amended Complaint. The motions have been briefed and argued and are ripe for decision. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, I find that Canal paid the claim in error and thus…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Nancy D. White v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. USAA Casualty Insurance v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santens v. Progressive Gulf InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  2. Watlington v. Progressive Classic InsuranceNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API