Legal Opinion

Burke v. Margolis

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided February 21, 1990No. 89-3200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

This cause is before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Defendants Jeremy Margolis and the Department of Illinois State Police. Defendants assert that Plaintiffs claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) must fail because Plaintiff is a state policeman and is not protected from mandatory retirement under the ADEA. Defendants further assert that Plaintiffs claim under the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment must fail because Plaintiff's complaint does not implicate a fundamental right or suspect class and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Marie Ellsworth & Paul Ellsworth v. City of Racine, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. IllinoisDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992
  2. Schulze v. Illinois State PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API