Lyszaj v. American Telephone & Telegraph Affiliates
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARRINER, District Judge.
On 19 October 1982 the Court received plaintiffs’ complaint and plaintiffs’ affidavits requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint alleges that plaintiffs’ constitutional rights have been violated because the telephone receivers installed by AT & T are not germ-free. The question presented is whether leave to proceed in forma pauperis should be granted and whether the complaint should be filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
Section 1915(a) provides that:
Any court of the United States may authorize the commencement ... of any suit, action, or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Evans v. CroomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Flint v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Boyce v. AlizaduhCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lyszaj v. American Telephone & TelegraphDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- Lyszaj v. American Telephone and Telegraph Affiliates and SubsidiariesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983