Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Vitiello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are not obligated to defend and indemnify their insured, the defendant Gaetano Vitiello, in an underlying action entitled Mayrich Construction Corp. v Vitiello, pending in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, under Index No. 78945/ 96, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated June 20, 2000, as, upon a decision of the same court dated May 1, 2000, declared that they are estopped from denying coverage and are required to indemnify the defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Rebell v. Emigrant Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Utica Mutual Insurance v. 215 West 91st Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Donati v. Marinelli Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacKay v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Wilson v. Hallen Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Matter of Neiss v. AsiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API