Legal Opinion

Liddle v. Hernandez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 5, 1923No. 10,535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

The defendant in error, Otitio Hernandez, obtained, in the county court of Sedgwick county, a judgment against Foreman & Sons, a partnership, for the sum of $978.50 and costs. Execution was issued and returned unsatisfied. A writ of garnishment was thereafter issued against The Great Western Sugar Company. This writ or summons was duly answered by the sugar company. The answer alleged, among other things, that the company has a grower’s contract with Foreman & Sons for the growing of. sugar beets during the season of 1921, and that there is due under the contract for beets delivered in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Maier v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Clatworthy v. FergusonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Wright v. Colorado Osteopathic Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Moore v. JacobucciSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brug v. HerbstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Mercantile Insurance Co. of America v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Middleton Lumber & Fuel Co. v. KosankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API