Legal Opinion

Liability of the United States for State and Local Taxes on Seized and Forfeited Property (II)

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided October 18, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

Liability of the United States for State and Local Taxes on Seized and Forfeited Property In c iv il fo rfe itu re p ro c e e d in g s (u n d e r 21 U S C § 8 8 1 ), th e U n ite d S ta te s is o b lig a te d to pay lie n s for s ta le a n d lo cal ta x e s a c c ru in g a fte r the c o m m is s io n o f th e o ffe n se le a d in g to fo rfe itu re an d b e fo re th e e n try o f a ju d ic ia l o rd e r o f fo rfeitu re, if th e lie n -h o ld e r e sta b lis h e s, b e fo re the c o u rt e n te rs the o r d e r o f fo rfe itu re , th a t it is an in n o cen t o w n e r o f the in te re s t it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Antonia Campos, Jose Campos, Milk-O-Mat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. MageeanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
  5. Eggleston v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API