Drewes & Co. v. Ham & Seymour
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion
On the Merits.
THOMPSON, J.
The' question presented for decision on this appeal is whether a state court has jurisdiction and authority to issue a preliminary and purely ancillary injunction against the Whitney Central National Bank, restraining the said bank from paying a draft and charging the same to the plaintiff, the draft being drawn by the ■ defendant Ham & Seymour on said bank by virtue of a letter of credit issued by the bank to Ham & Seymour for account of the plaintiff — the said court having jurisdiction both ratione materias and ratione person®, and the main demand and controversy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Van Reed v. People's National Bank of LebanonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Earle v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Planters Loan & Savings Bank v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Freeman Manufacturing Co. v. National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.