Legal Opinion

White v. Phillips

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchbeibeb, J.

The complaint in this derivative stockholders ’ suit is challenged on this motion as insufficient on the ground, among others, of noncompliance with section 61 of the General Corporation Law in that plaintiffs, at- the time of the original wrong complained of, were not stockholders, which is the fact.

Plaintiffs first contend, however, that the alleged wrong (assumption and payment by -the corporation of an indebtedness for which it was not obligated). is a continuing wrong to the present in that defendants thereafter failed to take steps to collect the amounts thus claimed to have been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Shielcrawt v. MoffettNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Laird v. . CartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Hastings v. Byllesby Co. (Granbery)New York Court of Appeals · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bauer v. Servel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Mirra v. MirraMassachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API