Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1901No. 13,574PublishedCited by 15 opinions

^ PPEAL from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans — King,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Blanchard, J.

Plaintiffs, Peter Johnson and E. J. Dare, appear as citizens and taxpayers of the city of New Orleans, and complain of the official action of the Common Council. In so far as that action may be illegal, and may result to the prejudice of themselves in common with their fellow taxpayers, they have the right to implead the city government. Handy vs. New Orleans, 39 La. Ann. 108.

But a suit thus instituted by taxpayers against a municipality must be a loona fide proceeding on their part, having the object to assert and protect their individual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Handy v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  2. State ex rel. City of New Orleans v. Judge of Division "B", Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. Silbernagel v. SilbernagelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. St. Charles St. R. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. Judges Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Brennan v. Sewerage & Water Board & Board of LiquidationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  5. Chevalley v. PettitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API